Saturday, August 21, 2021

Why google is one of the biggest failures in history (from my 2014 article)?

(Old articles being restored - an interim excerpt from my article first published in 2014)

(Note/ this is an initial outline and also needs some of the fact base ,e.g. $ figures to be updated )

Internal investments line Google apps, voice, wave, google docs, maps, google drive, phones, tablets., laptops, chromecast, chrome, Wallet, Google+ and external buys like YouTube, Motorola, Orkut To name a few have all been big failures . Had each been independent / standalone companies , then each of them would have been shut down long back either by shareholders/ venture capitals or sold at a throw away price.

The total one time investments in all the internal and external failed missions could easily top over $50 billion (since 2003, estimated). Excluding some if the tightly integrated acquisitions like Adsense or successful ones like android, google has spent a considerable amount of money as investment without returns. The last 5 year returns(profits) from these investment would not have crossed $10B ( after excluding operating costs) and will possibly never break even in the coming decade(s)

One of the few successes,  apart from the search,  that I can give credit to is Android and gmail. Although I am not fully convinced on how well has google has been monetizing it. Possibly helped increase search revenues.

Why has google failed so miserably? My guess is it is to do with the lack of leadership to define and execute a strategy. The founders are still hard running after the next big thing and the next level of management might not be groomed or empowered enough to play a pivotal role.

A well executed strategy involves 4 components - vision, definition of the strategy, execution and  People/leadership. Most of the failed initiatives /investments from Google started with a great vision. However, evidently, Google has failed in the remaining 3 components of it's strategy . Without going into who was the reason behind the failure, it clearly shows that the leadership element is found lacking in most of the above cases, if not all.

Well, it's not all scary about google. Investments like android, NEST and the robotic firms like Boston dynamics could pay off in the future.

PS: All the opinions expressed are personal and not

1 comment:

  1. During the last few|the earlier few|the earlier couple of} years there's been a surge in academic interest concerning drug delivery with help of|assistance from|the help of} AM strategies. This expertise presents a novel means for materials to be utilized in novel formulations. Moreover, one of the main advantages of 3D printing, especially within the case of fused deposition modelling , is the personalization of the dosage form could be} achieved, thus, targeting the patient's specific needs. In the not-so-distant future, 3D printers are anticipated to achieve hospitals and pharmacies in order to to} provide on demand manufacturing of personalized Pencil Sharpener Electric formulations according to the sufferers' needs. To become a viable industrial manufacturing possibility, there are a couple of challenges that 4D printing must overcome. The challenges of 4D printing embody reality that|the fact that} the microstructures of these printed smart materials must be near or better than the components obtained via traditional machining processes.


Digital is Not...

  Digital is not  just "traditional IT". Digital is not  only "robotic process automation (RPA)" based solutions. Digit...